Insights
Method mv1, window
2026-04-02 to 2026-07-01
,
20 posts considered
, run 2026-07-01.
Calculated Result
low confidence
In these 4 instagram video posts with duration under 15s, the median average view duration ratio was 55% higher than the 4 posts with duration 15 to 30s, between 2026-04-02 and 2026-07-01.
8 posts,
2026-04-02 to 2026-07-01.
Medians 0.8479 vs
0.5475.
No counterexamples in this sample.
How was this calculated?
This comparison is low confidence because the smaller group has 4 posts; the median difference is 55%; it survives removing the strongest post; the posts span more than 30 days. Higher confidence labels are disabled in method version 1 until its rules and fixtures are approved.
Observational comparison within this creator's own posts; it does not establish why the difference exists.
Formula: median average view duration ratio of the
4 posts with
under 15s versus the
4 with 15 to 30s.
Consider testing this as a controlled experiment before treating it as a rule.
Inspect evidence and give your verdict
Calculated Result
low confidence
In these 4 instagram still posts with a question opening, the median save rate by reach was 51% higher than the 8 posts with a statement opening, between 2026-04-02 and 2026-07-01.
12 posts,
2026-04-02 to 2026-07-01.
Medians 0.0305 vs
0.0202.
No counterexamples in this sample.
How was this calculated?
This comparison is low confidence because the smaller group has 4 posts; the median difference is 51%; it survives removing the strongest post; the posts span more than 30 days. Higher confidence labels are disabled in method version 1 until its rules and fixtures are approved.
Observational comparison within this creator's own posts; it does not establish why the difference exists.
Formula: median save rate by reach of the
4 posts with
question versus the
8 with statement.
Consider testing this as a controlled experiment before treating it as a rule.
Inspect evidence and give your verdict
Calculated Result
low confidence
In these 4 instagram video posts with a call to action, the median comment rate by reach was 50% higher than the 4 posts with no call to action, between 2026-04-02 and 2026-07-01.
8 posts,
2026-04-02 to 2026-07-01.
Medians 0.0120 vs
0.0080.
No counterexamples in this sample.
How was this calculated?
This comparison is low confidence because the smaller group has 4 posts; the median difference is 50%; it survives removing the strongest post; the posts span more than 30 days. Higher confidence labels are disabled in method version 1 until its rules and fixtures are approved.
Observational comparison within this creator's own posts; it does not establish why the difference exists.
Formula: median comment rate by reach of the
4 posts with
true versus the
4 with false.
Consider testing this as a controlled experiment before treating it as a rule.
Inspect evidence and give your verdict
What would unlock more
- average view duration ratio is unavailable for 12 of 12 posts in this group, so this comparison was not run.
- follows reported per reach is unavailable for 12 of 12 posts in this group, so this comparison was not run.
- Not enough comparable posts to evaluate topic for save rate by reach on instagram. Add at least 2 more video posts with topic set to gear to test this.
- Not enough comparable posts to evaluate topic for comment rate by reach on instagram. Add at least 2 more video posts with topic set to gear to test this.
- Not enough comparable posts to evaluate topic for share rate by reach on instagram. Add at least 2 more video posts with topic set to gear to test this.